Spam Comments – Comments Anyone?
Today the biggest challenge that Google faces is web spam. Google knows it and if you have been in the Internet marketing industry for any appreciable period of time, you know it. Heck, even frequent Google users no doubt noticed the lack of relevancy in the search results lately.
Recently, I have followed a number of threads online, in which many SEO practitioners have indicated the need to use spam comments in their link building efforts to achieve the results needed to retain clients. For certain types of clients or offers, this kind of high risk, quick results approach may work for a period of time. A sort of churn and burn approach, if you will. If the domain or domains are expendable, then spam comments as a risky SEO tactic may be suitable for your link building efforts, particularly if you understand that Google spam filters may catch and exclude the domain promoted by/links from spam comments. But, and this is a big but, ( | ) if this domain happens to be your brand name, you’ve now put yourself in a position to win free tickets to the Google Reconsideration Request Festivus. Good luck with that.
Now, while I understand the difference between performance advertising, branding advertising, and the need to manage return on investment, it’s not clear to me that spam comments clogging the Internet with endless volumes of low value spam links pointing to your target site is a good use of anyone’s time, even from a purely selfish SEO perspective. This position is stated in full recognition that spam comments as a link building/SEO tactic are working for may SEOs based on the spam comment dialogue on SEOMoz, the mass proliferation of the practice and the strong comments online from SEOs representing comment spamming strategies as both necessary and effective SEO techniques in today’s current Google environment. I am not sure I buy it.
The question is, how long will these comment spamming link building techniques work and what’s the effectiveness of 1000 comment spam links relative to three or four links from a high value, authoritative, established domain or better yet, a highly ranked page from within that domain? These kind of link opportunities demand legitimate, thoughtful, relevant comments. Regardless, many blogs worth commenting on use popular programs such as Akismet to automatically filter spam comments out before they ever get to the moderator. Even if your spam comment fools the programitic filters, good luck getting past the moderator, or better yet, community scrutiny.
The lack of long-term effectiveness of spam comments goes to the very foundation of link building and the fact that not all links are created equal. However, link building strategies that utilize spam comments seem to discount this all together going for more links instead of better links. High ranking blogs, if they allow comments, either nofollow the blog comment links or moderate out the links or post altogether. Therefore, comment spam in these instances is not effective.
So a strategy that can be evaluated as an alternative to content spam is one of targeting a few, very high-value links earned in the context of well-placed, thoughtful, relevant blog comments, which can have a tremendous positive SEO impact based on the passing of page rank and domain rank, not to mention the personal branding and traffic benefits as a result. Don’t just take my word for it, run some experiments yourself.
In the meantime, if comment spam is a core component of your SEO link building strategy, just make sure that you, and your client, are doing it with your eyes wide open, else risk suffering the painful wrath of the Google Web Spam Team who’s just doing their job. It’s not easy being the dominant US search market leader with over 2/3 of the US search market share which is why relevancy to Google and their users matters (ahhh can you smell the sarcasm
. If you don’t think Google is investing big $ and constantly fighting comment spam, then think again!!






Recent Comments